Hopkirk, Peter. Setting
the East Ablaze: Lenin’s Dream of an Empire in Asia.
Peter Hopkirk continues the
skillful combination of informal narrative and historiography found in The
Great Game with Setting the East Ablaze, an in-depth look at what he
calls the end of struggle for empire among European powers in Central
Asia. Unlike his previous work, which
was the multi-faceted story of Russian and British intrigues with and against
the fierce tribes of the harsh lands between the northern borders of British
India and the southern borders of the rapidly expanding Russian Empire under
the Tsars, Setting the East Ablaze is primarily the story of British and
Soviet intrigues against each other.
Although the peoples of Central Asia also have a significant part to
play in this real-life tale of derring-do, they are the supporting cast who add
life, meaning, and color. They also pay
the heaviest price of all of the groups involved in the “game”.
Hopkirk begins with the
mid-1918 journey of Lieutenant-Colonel Frederick Bailey from Chinese Turkestan
into Russian Central Asia. He believes
that the diplomatic mission of Lt. Col. Bailey’s party was doomed from the
start due to the sudden worsening of British-Soviet relations following the
execution of Tsar Nicholas and his family and the desecration of their
bodies. He also believes that if the
conditions in Russian Central Asia under the new Bolshevik regime were fully
understood in London or Calcutta Bailey and other British agents would have
rightly been kept clear of the whole affair. As it was they ran headlong into a
growing bloodbath that they were extremely lucky to escape with their lives.
Hopkirk draws on the accounts
of various European witnesses to Bolshevik tactics in places like Tashkent,
where he draws heavily from the memoirs of Danish Captain A.H. Brun, who had
been dispatched to the region to protect the interests of the mainly Austrian
and Hungarian prisoners of war held there.
Through the offices of Captain Brun, Hopkirk paints a compelling
portrait of the chaos and horror of the Russian Civil War and the means the
Bolsheviks were willing to use to secure power.
Although Brun arrived in Tashkent to a seemingly peace atmosphere,
“Everything appeared orderly enough in the still dawn of Central Asia. Turtle-doves fluttered over the low
roof-tops. Neat rows of silver-limbed poplars
lined the wide streets of the model, colonial-built capital.” The illusions of
tranquility were quickly shattered with Muslim demonstrations for the release
of political prisoners and a messy battle between the Bolsheviks and the native
population, followed by the declaration of an autonomous Muslim government of
Turkestan that would have an elected assembly with one-third of the
representatives being non-Muslims. The
Bolsheviks quickly responded to crush their opposition, based in Kokand, making
use of many former-POWs. Hopkirk
declines to describe much of the actual battle and massacre, though the details
he provides are horrifying enough: in an orgy of rape, murder, and plunder the
Bolshevik troops killed between five and fourteen thousand defenseless
townspeople and burned homes and mosques.
According to the Danish officer, A.H. Brun, “I was told that very one of
the members of the Kokand expedition had become a rich man, 10,000 to 20,000
roubles being an average share, and 200,000 a man nothing surprising.” Hopkirk
is quick to point out that many of the POWs joined the Red Army not out of
belief in Communism or out of blood thirst, but to simply gain access to needed
medicines, food and supplies, which were almost unheard of in the prisoner of
war camps.
The Bolsheviks were not the
only party guilty of atrocities and excess in the towns and on the battlefields
of Central Asia. When the Bolsheviks
marched on Bokhara, several hundred Russians living in the town were massacred
by rampaging mobs seeking vengeance in the only manner available to them. The worst perpetrator of violence in the
bloody period was most certainly Baron Roman Nicolaus Fyodorovich von
Ungern-Sternberg, who fought all comers in an attempt to recreate a
Mongol-Russian Empire based on his vision of a “Greater Mongolia”. Ungern-Sternberg was generally acknowledged a
complete madman. A shining example of
his madness comes from Dmitri Alioshin, a White Russian officer who claimed
that while reviewing new recruits Ungern-Sternberg would examine each and
decree one of three fates: service in the army, back to civilian life, or
death. According to Hopkirk, hundreds were killed in this manner. This was hardly the worst of the atrocities
committed by Ungern-Strenberg and his men.
On one occasion, two rail cars full of Jews ran afoul of the Baron and
were lynched. On another, after the
capture of Urga, young women were raped to death by squadrons of cavalry and a
baker’s boy was baked alive in an oven
Amongst the depictions of
chaos and horror, Hopkirk inserts an insightful discussion of political
tensions between the Soviets, Great Britain, and India. The Russian Revolution destroyed the fragile
detente between Britain and Russia regarding Central Asia, as the Soviets coveted
India for multiple reasons. These reasons
included gathering India’s economic resources for Soviet Russia and, failing
that, depriving Britain of them. Hopkirk
bases this on Lenin’s belief that, “England is our greatest enemy. It is in India that we must strike them
hardest.” Combined with the failure of Communism to make significant headway
against the governments of Europe, this led Lenin to push for greater Comintern
emphasis on Asia, saying, “The East will help us conquer the West.” One of the
more interesting stratagem’s Comintern tried was the “Army of God”, an attempt
by Grigori Zinoviev to unite Muslims to march against the British “oppressors”
in India. Further Comintern plans
against India included the creation of a military academy in Afghanistan.
Luckily for the British,
diligent Intelligence gathering uncovered the identities of Comintern’s chief
agents and their plans, even intercepting and reading almost all of their mail
and cable messages. This allowed them to
completely disrupt planned actions and insurgencies in India, and provided
fodder for the hawks in England. In May
of 1923, Britain sent an ultimatum to Lenin’s government insisted that all
Soviet agents operating against British interests be removed from Britain and
India. The Soviets were predictably
unimpressed, and their response indicated that they believed the British to be
guilty of operating in their sphere of influence against Soviet interests. They did finally agree to not support or provide
funds to any organization “whose aim it is to spread discontent or foment
rebellion in any other part of the British Empire.” The real result was for the
Bolsheviks to operate under the auspices of the Comintern, not their
government, for the uses of deniability.
In an effort to hide future
attempts at destabilizing British India, the Bolsheviks moved their area of
operations from Persian and Afghanistan north to China. The hope was that by helping the Chinese
Communists, headed by Sun Yat-Sen, the Bolsheviks would gain a secure base of
operations to launch insurgencies and invasions of India. Simultaneously, British Communist agents
working for Comintern were sent into India to surreptitiously build a Communist
Party structure hidden behind a labor organization called the Workers and
Peasants Party. Despite the Bolsheviks
best efforts at secrecy, British Intelligence quickly learned of their
activities in China. Hopkirk presents
convincing evidence of this in the form of excerpts of reports from the
Political Department of the India Office and the British Legate in Peking. According to the Political Department, “There
is evidence … that the Bolsheviks are arranging gradually to consolidate a
position in the outlying portions of the Chinese Republic which border on
India, from which, presumably, they hope to maintain a constant ‘direct attack’
in due course.” In September 1925, the British Legation notified London that
the Bolsheviks were infiltrating Chinese Turkestan to attack India from the north.
A final bit of color that
Hopkirk adds revolves around British internal political turmoil, particularly
during the mid-1920s as Labour and Tory governments pursue conflicting foreign
policy goals regarding the Soviets and Bolshevik expansion. One extreme example of this is the hysteria
by British conservatives upon the election of Labour leader Ramsay MacDonald as
Prime Minister. MacDonald granted
diplomatic recognition to the Soviet government. This and other moves caused a large rift to
develop between MacDonald and British security organizations, which Hopkirk
claims resulted in MacDonald’s defeat in less than a year as PM.
Setting the East Ablaze is an enjoyable combination of story-telling that
brings the many well-known characters and events involved in the Soviet-British
incarnation of the Great Game between World Wars to life. Although there are some distinctive
side-trips into events that do not strictly concern the rivalry between the two
Empires, such as the escapades of the “Bloody Baron” Ungern-Sternberg and Enver
Pasha in their attempts to create their own empires at the cost of the
Communists, there is nothing that does not fit into the overall scheme of the
work, and both episodes serve to demonstrate that there were other actors on
the stage that had an impact in the struggle for Central Asia.
There are only two small
flaws in an otherwise excellent work: the bibliography and index. The bibliography is restricted to an
alphabetical listing of sources, with no references to where the items are
referenced in the text, and no accompanying notes. This leaves it to the reader to investigate
each source to find potential additional information in an almost blind manner. The index is like the indexes in other
Hopkirk works: it primarily lists individuals and locations, perhaps a specific
location or battle. Cross-referenced
subject areas that would allow easy direct access to a topic are notably
absent. Both issues are small and easily
overlooked. Any student of history wanting more than a dry recitation of the
events concerning the British and Russian struggle in Central Asia will find
that Setting the East Ablaze adds the missing textures to the discussion
that brings history to life.
No comments:
Post a Comment